15 Comments
User's avatar
Read Whatever's avatar

I don’t know any of this, so interesting! Love the behind the scenes look.

Expand full comment
Andrea Bass's avatar

I’m glad to hear it!

Expand full comment
Kim Ourada's avatar

And, from what I understand, check out books...even if you might have to return (like time issues) because it shows that there is circulation. Yes?

Expand full comment
Andrea Bass's avatar

Absolutely! Circulation stats can help with funding, keeping books around, and proving patrons are using the resources available to them.

Expand full comment
Rita Ott Ramstad's avatar

I loved weeding, for all the reasons you explain so clearly and beautifully here. I was astounded at some of the things I found on the shelves of my district's libraries. It's such an important part of collection development!

Expand full comment
Andrea Bass's avatar

Yes! I have fond memories of some of the “gems” I’ve discovered on the shelves over the years. 🙂

Expand full comment
Katy O.'s avatar

Excellent as always, Andrea! I read this right after reading the disturbing newest newsletter from the esteemed Kelly Jensen ~ a timely pairing: https://buttondown.com/wellsourced/subscribers/95818245-3149-460d-a173-234a37f8cd1a/archive/CREW-Method-Manual

Expand full comment
Andrea Bass's avatar

I was going to link to the CREW manual and saw that it had been taken down. Thanks for sharing that post. Kelly Jensen is doing vital work right now.

Expand full comment
Brandilyn's avatar

I wonder about the crossover condition. If a book is old and potentially outdated but it's getting checkout a lot, does it stay? I know sometimes, even with nonfiction, that a text might be recognized as outdated but it's still considered "foundational" so people might want it to stay in circulation

Expand full comment
Andrea Bass's avatar

That’s a great question! In my experience, if a text is a classic and still getting circulated, we’ll either keep it or buy a new copy. If a nonfiction book is just old without being a foundational text, we’re most likely to buy a newer book about that same topic.

Expand full comment
Brandilyn's avatar

that makes sense, thanks for your response!

Expand full comment
Raquel Dias da Silva's avatar

This was such a refreshing and necessary defence of a practice that’s often misunderstood. Weeding isn’t about neglect or destruction, but about care and intention. I really appreciate the reminder that a well-maintained collection is a living one, shaped not by what we hoard but by what we curate.

There’s such an emotional charge around getting rid of books, especially for those of us who see them as sacred objects. But, as you rightly point out, a book that sits untouched and unnoticed for years isn’t fulfilling its purpose. Clearing shelf space is an act of generosity because we are ultimately making room for stories that will speak to someone now.

I also loved the connection you made between weeding and reader experience. There’s something quietly radical about making sure a library reflects its community’s actual needs and interests. And yes, I’ll admit it: I’ve caught myself judging libraries by their weeded titles, forgetting that sometimes letting go is the most responsible thing you can do.

Thank you for framing this so thoughtfully.

Expand full comment
Andrea Bass's avatar

Thank you for such a thoughtful comment!

Expand full comment
Raquel Dias da Silva's avatar

Thank you YOU for writing about such an important and touchy topic. I am really enjoying reading your newsletter!

Expand full comment
Pagomes's avatar

Today i learned a new concept. I love that everytime i read your texts i learn something new! Once a year i try to give some books to my local library or to someone i see that needs that thinking suplement 😊. Thank you so much for this!

Expand full comment